"Although such a view may seem perfectly innocuous to a secularist, to others it is the height of
blasphemy. One critic remarks, "that in order to sell phoney Chanel No. 5 on Oxford Street, you would
make it look like the real thing. Freemasonry has chaplains, prayers, ceremony, candles, and all the
`trappings' of religion. Because selling phoney Chanel No. 5 is wrong, so is Freemasonry."(8)"

Yes, I know who wrote this article - MCDONALD.

You see - GILL had told me the FAKE CHANEL No. 5 number...and I then relayed it on to MCDONALD for a laugh...he included it in the text.

Let us now examine this extract from the article below:

"The implicit meanings of the symbols suggest that many men were deeply troubled by the gender
bifurcations of Victorian society, which deprived them of a religious experience with which they could
identify and of a family environment in which they could freely express nurturing and paternal emotions.
The Royal Secret, like all the final degrees, dicted the assumption that men were innately impure,
aggressive, and unemotional. By affirming that men possess traits socially defined as female, the symbols
conveyed a message express nowhere else...These ideas and emotions could not be stated publicly. If
men had acknowledged that the orders were an alternative form of religion, of family, and of social
organization, the forces that had crushed Masonry in the 1820s [the Anti-Masonic hysteria in the United
States] might have again besieged the fraternal movement.(10)"


Yes, when you get the ROYAL ARCH FREEMASONRY 'camels' and TEMPLARS under one roof...they tend to dress up in WHITE BASQUES (no knickers) and wear high-heeled shoes and preen around the place...not to mention the touch of fake Chanel No. 5, eh boys?

That is the ROYAL SECRET as far as I am concerned and a product of ill cult 'illuminati programming' - and look where it ended you all up.