Here is a new comment from ANTHONY:

Whatever is fashionable as 'beauty' is purely the result of your chums' propaganda machine. 'The rise of people of African descent in popular culture' is likewise no natural phenomenon, but the product of an agenda geared to promoting race-mixing - that is the continuing attack on the white race. You talked of this yourself. I'm coming to believe you're a much dimmer bulb than you pretend. There is no reason at all western people should find Africans beautiful (aside from appeasing the vanity of silly women, who mistake feeling and sentiment for thought and who, where they are themselves Jewish, are about 5% African themselves). The ancient Chinese thought westerners 'ugly'. People cleave to their own. God women are dumb. Love the blog. Just get a sense of proportion.
By Antony on The NATIONAL ENQUIRER has an article about ANGELIN... on 25/04/11


Here is the last comment from ANTHONY.

Poor man - he is extremely brain-damaged, rather like LAING - his pituitary gland was probably burnt out. I mean even a four-year old child could have grasped my argument, which ran as follows:

Afro-Caribbeans, as MR DABYDEEN knew and stated himself…often have facial features which remind Western people of babies and young children. DABYDEEN was furious about that one and cited it as a reason for ‘babying’, talking down, patronising black people as ‘children’…

If you look at the ‘real world’ - you can see physical evidence of the above - how a lot of Afro-Caribbeans look in profile - it is a fact of life - a CONSTANT…the VARIABLE is the way in which 'those who do not have that look' decide to understand that ‘type of look’ and act or react to it.

(see previous notes - I have already cited BILLIE PIPER as an epitome of supposedly 'white, blonde' beauty in the UK but in point of fact, her facial features are 'African' - same with JADE GOODY, for that matter and GOODY was to use that one in argument against SHILPA SHETTI - how could she be racist as a 'white/black' herself etc etc)

ANTHONY not only refuses to mention the above argument - he ignores it entirely and goes off on a rant.


I would analyse his rant as coming from a very damaged psyche - because he REFUSES to talk about the main issue at hand, which is that PEOPLE TEND TO SEE BABIES/YOUNG CHILDREN AS BEAUTIFUL. That is what people tend to do - and that is a FACT of life, a ’CONSTANT’ for normal people.

ANTHONY is not normal. He doesn’t understand the main factor, underpinning the whole argument.

Why does ANTHONY not understand the basic premiss upon which the argument is based?

He refuses to acknowledge it and he will not discuss it. He appears to not even understand it.

I would guess that he has a very strange relationship to ‘BABIES’ and ‘YOUNG CHILDREN’.

I would guess that his reactions and responses to BABIES and YOUNG CHILDREN are not natural or normal.

Secondly one can see from his ‘total lack of argument’ that ANTHONY is a ‘RELATIVE ROBOT’ as I have chosen to call this type of person, who has fallen victim to ill cult academic ‘training’.

He wants you to believe that there are no CONSTANTS or FACTS in life, such as finding children and babies beautiful and loving them…

…that you can be made to believe ’just about anything’ if your cultural machine has decided to teach you a certain belief or belief system - for example that ‘pleasure is pain’ and that ‘pain is pleasure’.

That is why the ill cult Satanists LOVED the idea of ‘relativism’. There are no CONSTANTS - only VARIABLES.

Do I have a psychopath on my tail? You bet - but then the ill are always psychopathic - however ‘hidden’ within their social context.

This comment has one interesting side-effect to my mind, because it unwittingly highlights the link between the USE AND ABUSE of children/babies by the ill and the treatment of black people in Western society.