http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11660210

1 November 2010 Last updated at 00:29

Alcohol 'more harmful than heroin' says Prof David Nutt.

The title is misleading because the data was screwed...the team had put together two sets of data that didn't belong together...they should have kept them separate i.e. drug-use which harms the user and drug-use which harms others around the user. Instead they put the two together and came up with the above silliness. I mean - watch TOMLINSON whilst in COLD TURKEY and see how violent he was, upon the streets...and anywhere really...


I can remember MARK R laughing at this one - he knew PROF NUTT but in what capacity...a mind control slave obviously...but i have no idea what MARK R was up to...anyway, the above article is laughable and just goes to show how the massaging of statistics and ill-conceived interpretation of data by DUMBOS can operate...and I agree that socially, ALCOHOL on the streets creates 'raging bulls' in this country...and is known to cause 'violence in the home'...and is the most tolerated drug in this country...but when talking about HARM to people in general:

The simple fact is that HEROIN abusers tend to die 20 years younger or more than alcoholics...and CRACK abusers probably die about 30 years younger or more...and that is because of 'overdose'...if you drink too much, 10 to 1 you will be sick and therefore your health isn't in danger anymore...not the case if you have injected or breathed in too much HEROIN/CRACK...you are dead as a doornail...and it doesn't matter 'how healthy' you were before you did it...

So PROF NUTT and his team would have done better to include LIFE EXPECTANCY within their research as the most important consideration, before talking about what drugs are more harmful than others...

"The modelling exercise concluded that heroin, crack and methylamphetamine were the most harmful drugs to individuals, but alcohol, heroin and crack cocaine were the most harmful to others."

I agree with the above entirely...one can see that the results of the team were rather screwed though...and I can guess that PROF NUTT had fallen out with MARK R...

"The Lancet paper written by Prof Nutt, Dr King and Dr Lawrence Phillips, does not examine the harm caused to users by taking more than one drug at a time."

Yes that appears to make most sense of all...TOMLINSON used to take all sorts of stuff...so did GILL...so did the rest of them at GREEN TOWER...and they were the most HARMFUL people on the streets...complete psychopaths, now and then...MCDONALD used to take anti-depression prescriptions as well...as COKE/HEROIN...whatever MARK R decided to shoot him up with that day...you name it...

Remember TODDY and his cocktails...and his insane behaviours afterwards...

If you want people to 'manage' their habit...the first thing to do would be to recommend sticking to one drug only and knowing its effects...

CIA DRUGS...the horror of it all...but DRUGS are the important issue...possibly the most important issue to deal with, when dealing with the ill cult (including drug mafias/smuggling/blackmarkets)...so no wonder the ill cult decided to screw PROF NUTT's research and data...poor man, I feel for him. You did your best against all the odds there...on ill cult territory.

I mean if we don't talk about 'large numbers' as in epidemiology...and look at what is probably the most terrible 'drug problem' in this country...i would say that it was the TEMPLARS and their blood disorders on RAINBOW JUICE/PCP and whatever else they might have mixed into their cocktail...'poisoned MOSS well water' etc...to go BERSERKER, whilst planning the fate and future of the country...there's real 'danger' for you...shall I write the next article for THE LANCET? (heh, heh)

Yes it was DUMBO who screwed their research wasn't it...SCARLETT...DUM-BO-RING?

SCARLETT's network are saying that it was DEE A BORE SHUN...perhaps it was both of you...