...and the 'linguistic'...what can one say? I was antagonistic to quasi-collie and the like....because...how do I put it? they had been formulating a type of 'linguistic philosophy' in order to describe what was happening to them...to their minds....to their brains..in relation to their chips....

for example...when their chip told them to see a white and gold dress as 'blue'...that is what they then did....

however, the above 'horror' was to set up...how shall I call it? a 'dissonance' somewhere in the brain....the incoming message/stimuli/input had been recoded...to then enter consciousness as 'something else'...and the mind 'knew' it...but couldn't dig it all up again in order to make sense of what was really going on....go figure.

...and so those like quasi-collie would maintain that the world of the senses wasn't at all trustworthy....in fact it might not even exist...."it was purely subjective" replies MI5 ONLINE....exactly that....and of course, that sort of 'silliness' was to worry me...in fact it was downright scary...and now I know why..."they must have been more scared, themselves"...yes, when I look back on it...that must have been quite true..."no bedrock...no sanity".

look at taylor swift's reaction to that whole 'dress' number:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2971409/What-color-dress-White-gold-blue-black.html

you see a 'white and gold dress'....

the computer chip in your brain, says no - "it's a blue and black dress"....

now that must be very scary indeed....taylor swift gives an honest emotional response....and...."almost gets there" replies MI5 ONLINE...

yes, it was definitely a trick....go figure: