humour in psychology...normally associated with the 'feelgood factor' and various superficial analyses....

however intelligence has known since 'whenever' that it is normally associated with the "i am me - don't mess with me or else i will socially embarrass/humiliate you publicly - and everybody will fall about laughing at you" factor....a hugely manipulative tool-in-the-box....

no wonder, mark r was to find out the following and 'early on'...regarding british intelligence recruitment...that the genuinely funny children from langley juniors, for example....see previous notes...had been snapped up/signed up for BI early on - that early on - by 10 years old...and that left those like..."only a handful" replies BI ONLINE....

what else?.....well there was a certain category that the 'good and bad and the ugly' fell into - at langley seniors and beyond...'successful' bullies tended to fall into that category...along with anybody else who wanted 'power'....to do and say what they wanted...'more agency' if you like....'more space'....those who were consciously aware of trying to be witty 'in a public place'...those like helen browne, for example....or 'less so' in the case of tanya and cathy, in exeter...that was more a case of 'natural wit'...and a defensive manoeuvre...rather than an attacking one - those like 'browne' and 'spence' from H class in langley seniors - weren't particularly funny...they tended to 'ape' being comedians....whereas their efforts to be funny - were often what made people really laugh...go figure.

caroline hughes and anthony colin farrell at dartington....well they were 'comedians' but in yet another 'category'...caroline would go into a 'public place/situation' with a naughty smile upon her face...the thought in her head, would invariably run along the lines of "how am i going to shock all of these people?"....colin and caroline were 'attention to me' people....and yet i cannot say that he consciously chose to do it...because it appeared to be more of an 'oh jesus moment' as the eldest taschmann used to laugh...."we call him jesus...." - let me see.... he just 'did it' and it worked...i.e. got him 'whatever-he-appeared-to-want-to-attract....' consciously or unconsciously...whereas with caroline - it appeared to be an entirely different matter....and consciously thought out, to an extent...."if i do this - i get that..."

do people who are 'loud' fall into this category? let me see - at dartington.....sally tallant was 'loud' and naturally funny (she used to make people 'fall about', now and then)....she was running a hi-tech computer system for the prague rothschild, in totnes....go figure.

people who are loud and naturally funny, at the same time...are usually highly aggressive in staking their own territory/right-to-be wherever they are and 'doing what they are doing....'

what about those who are generally 'loud' are they also generally funny?

rama was 'loud' at dartington but she was rarely funny...just 'good-humoured' - with a smile upon her face but not always - sometimes it was simply to warn everybody off (jacqui jones was the homegrown variety)....look at rama's background (she had been the best friend of caroline hughes at school)....indian/muslim religion...rebelling against the whole lot by calling herself by a boy's name 'rama'....and working it out in a foreign country.....'colonial power' country....because her family had had to leave the east, for whatever reason....upper class, aristocracy - in the east...although unable to afford that sort of lifestyle or 'class' in the west....uppermiddle class, in london....by virtue of her father's profession....and very 'well-to-do'....

oh i see where this is going now...and i can begin to understand rama befriending caroline hughes at school....because i can see a similar situation at langley juniors/seniors....with debbie mcdonough...the blonde girls who look like angels-with-dirty-faces (angel gabriels)...who blurt it out-to-shock....."she reminds me of gnasher...y'know...out of the BEANO"...."moulin rouge - dancers"....see previous notes.

....there is a scene, near to the end of DELHI-6....where a 'guru' is attempting to tell his entourage...about what he can see' in the air....how 'it all is'....

i was reminded of being at langley seniors and 'seeing' what programmers had programmed other children with....rather like seeing 'photos' within their auras....or 'short videos'....

ill cult programmers are often 'funny' in relation to what they choose to program their victims with...therefore 'blurting it out' is often an effortless way of being funny...although you might get beaten up for doing so...if you didn't happen to look like 'angel gabriel' or a 'guru', that is etc etc....

what can i conclude but that 'some of us' actively court the 'stage of life' and others do not...the reasons for which - are multifarious....

"don't put your daughter on the stage, MRS WORTHINGTON" i was to chant to daldry - in prague 1995, at 'that party'...after telling him that he would have a daughter...whom he would love more than anybody in the whole world....

i didn't like puppet shows, you see....not much at all....nor cakes....

OTHER NOTES:

so what is DELHI-6 all about? i am not even going to bother....simply watch it yourself....emet had said that the film BASIL had.....everything thrown in there....well DELHI-6 tops that one by....how does one say it?....to the nth degree.....

...all i can say is that DELHI-6 is a very, very, very important film to watch - if you want to 'get' what this was all about...in terms of the history of 'all of that'....go figure.

'the deeper well'....chinese culture...buddhism.....indian culture...go figure....how deep do you want to go, down the rabbit hole?

OTHER NOTES:

for my own part....and i will be concise....i was always most interested in.....bringing the ill cult down...that was always foremost in my mind - see previous notes...the royal genome project etc etc.....my focus of study had been science, not religion....it still is.

'religion, politics, militaries, social class' were subjects that had fascinated gill....who immediately wanted to know what the uniforms of the military police, in DELHI-6 were all about....as we watched the film.....

what else?

CF was to admit the following 'at the time that we were all to watch DELHI-6'....so many years ago now....has any of CF's 'information' changed, since that point in time? we are going back so many years, here....

in short, he was to intimate that he and the taschmanns had been using "suitcases of dvd covers - stuffed full of money (notes)" along the silk trail (see previous notes upon 'heaven nightclub').....the harry potter money....you see the taschmanns hadn't dared to do 'bank transfers'....

.....and that is how all of that harry potter money, ended up in kazakhstan - lorry-loads of it....

....almost all of the money....because bangkok police (not delhi) were to stumble upon something.....and 'stumble' is the right word....somebody really did 'stumble' over a suitcase of dvds....one suitcase then opened and a dvd fell out - half-open - the cellophane had been broken - to reveal banknotes.....

anyway, later on, the word 'stumble' is not correct.....the bangkok police were to 'get a handle' upon the whole thing....indian intelligence were not informed, for some time....go figure.

what else?

CF was to tell us...'so many years ago now'...that the route was from BANGKOK to AZERBAIJAN....and then KAZAKHSTAN....go figure....

OTHER NOTES:

and there was a jooish ashkenazim password.....something around 'mind the gap'.....as in G-D.....and CPU....go figure.

in short, indian intelligence were to figure out what the 'gap' meant in computing terms.....in CPU terms.....conflated with the 'conscious and unconscious mind'....the left and right brain etc etc...'hole in the wall'....godspot at the centre of your brain etc etc.....

God is not a hole....unless you are a cabbage - that is all i can say.