Wednesday 15 April 2015

OTHER NOTES:

'the anarchic factor team'....

i can remember green tower getting spielberg to 'spot continuity mistakes' etc in their faked footage of hitler...using WWII authentic film reels - to film their footage with, that they had stolen from a museum...film that had been supplied to the nazis...they were also to use authentic nazi cameras etc...

anyway, spielberg was to spot something that looked like a 'red lorry' in the far distance - with a landscape of green...just a 'speck' consisting of a shape made up of two red rectangles...but that was enough to cause a furious dispute - in relation to whether it should be spliced out of the film...along the lines of "what if somebody found out that nobody was producing, selling or driving red lorries, around that area and in europe in general - towards the end of WWII?"

ending up in a discussion along the lines of "whose side are you on, anyway?" to the answer "whose side are you on - aren't we supposed to be doing that ?" .....as in 'aren't we supposed to be making it subtly obvious that our film is a fake in order to prove a point that history can be rewritten in relation to general hoag and 1943 when WWII should really have ended but didn't...and the ill then followed their 'future script' and threw in a lot of 'doubles' for 'hitler and his cronies' - and made that 'eagle's nest' hollywood techincolour movie of 'hitler in his bunker in 1945' etc etc...

anyway, the 'green tower' discussion was to end along the lines of "well if you put it that way - does anybody here, trust anybody else at all - and you are talking about sides????"

...what next? i sense a 'rumbling' around "let's make a comedy superhero movie about anarchists"...

"whose side are you on?"

"you're talking about sides...and yet not one person in this group...in this whole organisation...trusts anybody else...and you are talking about taking sides?"

yes, 'trust' is supposed to be a pretty elementary requirement for 'bonding'...be it in a friendship or a relationship, or membership of a club...or a gang...or a political party...and if trust is lacking? well you have a very shaky 'organisation' upon your hands....

"reminds us of the stasi" replies MI5 ONLINE.

....and the overview of the above? this morning i was wondering about SIS and 'for how long' they were going to continue to 'make substitutions' with doubles...for example - rickson's wife, polly teale - 'went by the wayside' a long time ago...for being an arch-member of the ill cult paedophile ring - and who had 'taken care' of that one? ....well 'courtesy of rimington and gill', in southend - see previous notes....no doubt, 'clacton rebel group' were pleased to learn that teale had 'met her end' - after abducting two children from clacton...children that were never seen again....

....and yet, no doubt another 'polly teale' will 're-appear'...directing another play, somewhere in the UK...perhaps in 2015...in 2018...and maybe she will meet her death in 2022....you see - this is how SIS and the ill cult 'do it'...if somebody features in their 'future scripts'...they will substitute in a 'double' or a 'clone'....and continue to fake and forge the future - in relation to what they had written - the future that they still 'want to happen' and that is how they will try to 'make it happen' their way...."to pretend that they still have some kind of control over the future - and they use their media machine to do it" replies MI5 ONLINE.

...so you read about people who are 'long dead'...who now have 'clones' or 'doubles' in place....all doing what the ill had decided that the 'widget' should do, upon the public stage....until their 'act' is over...."it is rather like a stage play" replies MI5 ONLINE...."one actor or actress goes by the wayside and so they substitute in another"...

...and that is why i am wondering now...about SIS and the ill cult in general....how long are they going to keep it up for?

"as long as it takes - all mental robots, by this point in time" replies GCHQ.

No comments:

Post a Comment