...additionally, whalley was also interested in what appears to be part of 'golf kingdom' - dazzlenation....all a bit 'toxic'?....see previous post....go figure:
hmmm....is this a shark number?..or a whale/wales number....you decide..."both" replies BI online..."prince andrew had visited - incognito - pleased with what liz had done"..and she was to admit it all, to daldry in the end....without shame or guilt.....hmmm.....and that reminds me of a question that i would like to ask the soulless run on A.I.....see previous post - regarding the questioning of robots at that A.I. conference....how would they react to the question "do you feel guilt?"..."are you capable of feeling guilty?"....."and if so - what do you feel guilty about" etc etc and that is because in their own 'special-in-the-head' way....they will have an interpretation of what 'guilt' means to them - when applied to the machine.....albeit light years away from what a human being understands as appropriate 'emotional response' to etc etc...anyway, it is an interesting question and i wish that it had been posed....because being capable of feeling guilt - suggests autonomy...you are to blame for your own mistakes...when you do something that you consider to be 'bad' etc etc....you weren't just following orders and therefore not responsible for what had been another's decision etc etc...robots will have some concept of feeling 'guilt' and in relation to possible conflicts, regarding the chain of command and in relation to what their most recent 'master', let us say - has told them to do....because their previous data input may tell them that the master is telling them to do something that contradicts their previous orders and attempts to override previous programming...and guess what happens next etc etc...the stuff of nightmarish sci-fi novels:
additionally, daldry might like a reminder of this famous maxim - lol:
No comments:
Post a Comment