....of course you could argue that I might come under the first bullet-point which disqualifies you from jury service if 'you are, for the time being, liable to be detained under the Mental Health Act'....but seeing as I was only sectioned for a month  - in December 2008...and after that....the staff had to let me 'stay on' because my sectioning had made me effectively homeless....psychiatric nurses were to get annoyed with the whole thing....some were nice about it..."we don't believe you are mentally ill" and some were offensive "you've bed-blocking"....anyway, sectioned for only a month....nearly 9 years' ago, now....well, it doesn't look like as if I am 'liable' to be sectioned again, does it? I am one of CHP's best residents...in that I keep their flat up to the standard required and get on with my neighbours etc etc....no complaints lodged against me during my entire 'stay' in this CHP flat....no complaints for 8 years....but then why should there be? because I am a nice 'normal' socially-adjusted sort of person...unlike the petrol nells of this world...go figure.

anyway, it is a moot point...as to whether I might come under that first bullet-point....seeing as I am on ESA benefits for a supposedly  terminal 'mental health' problem....but you see how it could be twisted against me, by the ill...who simply want to order me to come in for a 'pre-service visit' in order to entrap me?

...and that is why I 'came down on them hard' with that enclosed sheet....to ensure that if they now decide to continue with their plan..."that they will look bloody silly in doing so" replies MI5 ONLINE....exactly that....if they want to be the object of ridicule...then they can continue with their sick and stupid plan....winnie's words come to mind "but mental robots is mental robots"....and so we shall see what they decide to do next....because normally they carry on and do whatever they had planned to do - within this sort of context...despite the ridicule....go figure.