...secondly, something that BI had coded out...regarding an old possession of Tanya's....a red/white clothes-peg-plastic-octopus...."remember that" etc etc....and why, precisely - BI?...because the till receipts at the CRUK shop as well as the CEX shop, would be coded out at a certain point, within the future....LOL...i.e. the receipts would contain the codes necessary to etc etc....but what if you only managed to find one of those two items?....oh and the second one had been a dvd from the CEX shop...anyway, it is no coincidence that upon opening my camera files upon this laptop - that they were to immediately open upon a certain image of the 'codes' rather than the first image that I had taken, this morning...and what else?...well, this appears to be a BI 'testing of systems' morning...and so perhaps I shouldn't put up, upon my blog, what is on those till receipts?...in short, GCHQ was supposed to have been able to 'read' all of those tills receipts via a 'trial' computerised system...LOL....and so 'better not' then, eh?...see previous notes upon those MI5 'Russian course' tests...e.g. linda-from-the-library escaping down the fire-escape with a large tome from the public library 'reservation dept' etc etc....oh and that had been way before becoming a library employee *undercover* had even been a 'twinkle' in Linda's eyes....emet (pentagon) was to say that MI5 had simply been 'testing systems' and that is why there had been those...such as rimington...who used to 'blow a fit' if you actually managed to complete the task-in-question etc etc and that is 'why' - dear reader...ling's radio witches from the local library and I, have 'something in common' let us say - having all been upon the same course i.e. sometimes it is best not to reveal that you have, in fact, managed to complete the task given, successfully etc etc...a 'barrier' that I was to come up against, many times - in 1980...to then be told and in no uncertain 'vitriolic' terms "YOU HAVE FAILED!" etc etc...asking 'why' was always useless, I might add...or 'what do you want me to do? why don't you tell us all beforehand - whether you want us to pass this test or not? it would make life easier' etc etc....see previous notes upon 'all of that'....and the upshot?....well, ling's radio witches, as well as myself - then learned not to say whether you had 'passed' a certain test or not i.e. if you figured that it wouldn't be a good idea, in the long run but you had no real idea why...but you knew that the result of saying that you had managed to complete the task would result in more 'disapprobation' i.e. torture/trauma programming....LOL because in 'upside-down-world' or mickey-mouse-world/looking-glass-land..."military fairies land" replies BI ONLINE...everything turns into its opposite (programmers tell you that right is wrong and wrong is 'right' etc etc)...and that is the point where you begin to tell your MK programmers, that you had failed - whilst looking suitably 'shamed-faced' etc etc whilst wondering why these people who are 'running' you - are supposed to be 'intelligent'...additionally, you wondered why they 'shrieked with laughter' quite a bit of the time, after snorting 'whatever' from...well, for example - in rimington's old tobacco tin... nota bene, manningham-buller had a silver-cigarette-case number "my most prized possession" etc etc but it was often 'empty'...rimington then used to chant "old mother hubbard' etc etc...anyway, we were only young, upon that 1980 course and so we just had to 'work it out' as we went along....in short, you get a 'sixth sense' about it all, in order to survive...go figure.