...and yes, I think that the BBC is wilfully misreading...what they have printed themselves, here...whilst contradicting themselves, in the reporting of it all, dazzlenation...we begin with the following:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-52496098

Earlier the US national intelligence director's office said it was still investigating the virus' origins. But the office said it had determined Covid-19 "was not manmade or genetically modified".

to then get 'this':

In a rare public statement, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which oversees US spy agencies, said on Thursday it concurs with the "wide scientific consensus" regarding Covid-19's natural origins.
"The [intelligence community] will continue to rigorously examine emerging information and intelligence to determine whether the outbreak began through contact with infected animals or if it was the result of an accident at a laboratory in Wuhan."

and so what do you make of it, dazzlenation?..."misinformation" replies BI online...and you are referring to the BBC?

It was the first clear response from American intelligence debunking conspiracy theories - both from the US and China - that the virus is a bio-weapon.

'dis' or 'mis', eh?

and you've put the BBC into the 'nuclear' category, let us say?

 

or you could simply say that mistakes/errors-of-judgement have been made...with might include a reference to that 'coronavirus' patent....designed in order to make progress, within the treatment of lung disease...the research is then taken up and used as a bio-weapon etc etc...as it goes, eh?