...oh and it's interesting that the ill are no longer bothering to engage in a discussion about the 'bathroom basin' in writing...they use the demonstrative pronoun 'this', to refer to the whole issue....although they are still calling it 'basin waste' in the title of the email - to add insult to injury, as it were...."shows how stupid they are" replies BI ONLINE....and that, too...ha ha ha....oh and look at the following:

 

that 'no access' number....see previous notes upon ling redirecting my mail to another address in Clacton before it eventually ends up at belle court...which confuses the postman, every time etc etc and so he writes upon it 'no access' because ling's operative is no longer 'in situ' at that address....go figure.

 

and there's more....CHECK WASTE TO BASIN...isn't it all so pathetic?

 

....oh and why do they always put 'appointment: not applicable'?...I have never received one CHP letter, which had the appointment booked, upon it - as far as I can remember....go figure.

 

anyway, the other letter was about the light fitting, again....what a waste of paper....the odd thing is that the dates upon both CHP 'light fitting' letters are the 4th and the 3rd of December....and yes, bizarrely enough - the 4th of December letter arrived before the 3rd of December letter....go figure.

 

...and what else?...'radio files' for today - marines....go figure: