Saturday, 30 December 2017

....MIB III...and so this is all about 'mr puerto rico'....mr 'alien' puerto rico....hmmm...just what is being said here, CIA?....go figure:
oh and 'by chance'...somebody looking very like 'mr puerto rico' was to stand behind me, in a trolley till queue, at M&S, this morning (having formerly stood beside me, whilst i was choosing a certain product from a certain shelf - which i shall talk about, later - in this post)...
....and the funny thing was...mr peurto-rico's partner....or perhaps....wife-in-dark-glasses, was carrying a stick...a white stick (see previous notes upon MI6 blindman's stick programming)....and whilst i was collecting my shopping, at the end of the till...she then began to march towards me and would have marched straight into me - until he tapped her forcefully upon the shoulder...hmmm...in brief, no 'blind person' would do that...would you, do that - if you had been blindfolded?....no, dear reader - you would have relied upon your other senses, to 'detect' those around you and 'sensed' your way forward,...blind people tend to be 'astute' -regarding objects around them....go figure.
...whatever, the case maybe...and it is an odd one...lisa forster (eliza manningham-buller's ex-righthand-woman) appears to have been behind 'quite a few events' that were to occur, this morning....and she had  been using a 'mask'...that of 'prince andrew' for some reason.....couldn't be bothered to do any of it, himself?... "not clever enough" replies MI5 ONLINE...hmmm....i am now detecting 'fergie' as in 'sarah ferguson' at work..."i'll do it for you" she had told the queen...."used lisa's imprint" and that had been a really, really wicked one - hadn't it?....go figure.
....sarah ferguson...and you wonder why the greeks had imprisoned her, not that long ago? ....oh and what are her daughters like...really like, i mean - MI5?
...i remember now...this is all about spotting the 'lisa forsters' and 'sarah fergusons' of this world...for example - princess diana was to say to police detectives, early on - having been given the good advice i.e. not to have that much to do with 'fergie'..."but she's my best friend!...that's impossible!" etc etc....and so continued with the 'dates' in her 'luncheon' diary, every week...prince andrew's wife, for heaven's sake and look at what a crook, that man - has been and still is...and i might add that - if anybody or anything, can 'undo' a marriage - it is 'other people' - rather than the married couple, involved - themselves...because 'hearsay' and 'gossip' can create 'quicksands' all over the place...go figure.
OTHER NOTES:
...and what else?...MI5 toby was to say 'an entirely different matter'...as in the basic metaphorical difference between the rockefellers and the rothschilds.....e.g. somebody steals your wallet upon the street....you don't realise until you get home (a rothschild number)....to summarise - it was a theft, committed by somebody that you didn't know....compared with a theft within your workplace or your own home (a rockefeller number)....by somebody who had befriended you - somebody  that you had really come to like and admire - who then steals your wallet....and of course, you would never ever have suspected them....isn't that somehow, kind of 'worse'?...and believe me...i have been the unwilling victim/recipient of both types of abuse....go figure.
"both thieves" replies BI ONLINE....yes but i am talking about the emotional and psychological 'harm' done, here....which the rockefellers appeared to really 'get off' on....go figure....hmmm...the 'masonic element'....okay, so go and have a look at 'robo' uncle bobby clayton, for example...he hadn't cared a jot, whether or not, the whole world hated him...and they did...his whole, small, 'insular' world - had hated him...and what is more - he had 'got off' on it....pleasure/pain switch 'switched'?....the micro and the macro - uncle bobby and mark r....see previous notes....go figure.

OTHER NOTES:

...anyway, gill's team at M&S were expecting me to find 'something wrong/odd' about my M&S till receipt 'result', today....and all I can pinpoint is the following.....a certain item that was 'differently named' - in relation to its code (although ingredients are named within that description)......and therefore....etc etc.....go figure:






No comments:

Post a Comment