Sunday, 14 March 2021

 ....and what's new upon the BBC frontpage, dazzlenation?...."a really iridious position from...to find ourselves in"....talking about valence?....go figure:

Sarah Everard: Met Police chief will not resign over vigil scenes - BBC News



Valence (psychology) - Wikipedia


hedonic...hedonism...hmmm...is cressida dick implying that those assembled had worked themselves up into some 'hedonic trance' but not in a pleasurable way?...see previous notes upon mark r and the pleasure/pain switch....anyway, having not been there or seen the footage, i have no idea.

let's have a look at the footage, then?....hmmm...well, if it had been my decision...i would have let them get on with it...tire themselves out...and NOT allowed my officers to break the law by interfering with 'freedom of speech'....if there were any troublemakers, in the midst...i would have had undercover staff 'in' there to take photos and pick them up, after the event...and last but not least...if it had been one of my staff who was responsible, in the first place - for 'all of that'...then i would not have sent other members of my own staff in, to arrest them...just fanning the flames etc etc...go figure.

oh and additionally, i still have not quite got to the bottom of it all, as yet....even though i smell a big rat, here....see previous notes upon that whole caroline stoller/sophie gyde number.....because the photographs don't match up and a little bird tells me that MOD/MI5 evans had released that close-up pic of everard - which is in point of fact, a photo of the young caroline stoller....shades of MI5 queering the pitch?....see previous notes upon what rimington used to tell sue whalley to do, whilst attached to a police department regarding the photos of victims....all sick 'n' stupid etc etc...........and let us not go even near the supposed 'stupid behaviour' of both victim and suspect, before the event...visiting a friend?...how many 'incidents' have there already been, upon clapham common etc etc....oh and if that police officer had been prone to exposing himself then he should have been under a psychiatric order, at the time etc etc.....nothing is 'right' about the whole story - is it, dazzlenation?

No comments:

Post a Comment