A new review of my 'J K ROWLING DIDN'T WRITE THE HARRY POTTER SERIES'...

It is all about THE PROTOCOLS OF ZION - so somebody obviously wants a 'platform' upon this blog - to explore that one.

Naturally I shall give it to them - freedom of speech and all that - but one has to ask WHY?



Review entered by Alba Arboleda Previous Review | Next Review

This is the review Alba Arboleda entered for your story "J K ROWLING didn't write the HARRY POTTER series"
This review was submitted Tuesday


Hello, “PARKER MARSCAPONE’
Some interesting things here – for example, I’d never heard of MKULTRA so reading your piece sent me to the Wikipedia entry, “Project MKULTRA, or MK-ULTRA, was the code name for a covert, illegal CIA human research program, run by the Office of Scientific Intelligence. This official U.S. government program began in the early 1950s, continuing at least through the late 1960s, and it used U.S. and Canadian citizens as its test subjects.”
Of course, being one you’d probably classify as being of the “satanic mud-bloods” myself, I realize you aren’t able to read anything I write as having any validity, even if you did come back to this site.
Most of what you have written has its origins in a hoax from the 19th century. Well, as the Nazis gleefully said many times, “Repeat a big lie often enough and people will come to believe it!”
Millions of people have seen a TV series called "Horseman [or 'Knight'] Without a Horse" produced by Dream TV in Egypt. It is 41 episodes long. It is being shown all around the world.
It is a TV adaptation of "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion," Adolf Hitler's favorite book.
Those who push "The Protocols" generally claim it is the minutes of a meeting of Jewish leaders, whom the book bizarrely calls "Elders of Zion." The most obvious theme of "The Protocols" is that Jewish people are supposed to be this homogeneous block of conspirators with nearly supernatural powers, and led by cunning Masters of Deceit (the "Elders of Zion") who are united behind the goal of ruling over gentiles.
The Protocols was shown to be a hoax in a superb series of articles published in the London Times back in 1921.
The Protocols" is a convenient tool for those who hold power and wish to distort, forestall or undermine democracy.
Ordinary people everywhere are susceptible to racist arguments. So undemocratic establishment forces often try to mobilize people's fears of particular ethnic groups so as to distract them from the real source of inequality and oppression: the establishment elite.
The ethnic group targeted has often been Jewish people because they are a distinct minority in many countries.
The first and most obvious effect is to provide a scapegoat on whom to blame all social problems and discontent, thus diverting the majority from organizing against the real holders of power.
"The Protocols" states that progressive movements - as far back as the 18th century movement for Liberty, Equality and Fraternity - are all secretly the work of Jews. By spreading the ideas of "The Protocols", fascist operatives, often covertly employed by seemingly respectable Establishments, can accuse those who demand change or who expose abuses of being agents of 'The Jews'.
Since anti-Jewish prejudice (anti-Semitism) is common anyway, presenting the struggle for social reform as being controlled by 'The Jews' is an attempt to convince people that social reform is bad for them. Thus, the ideas in "The Protocols" are used to poison the very terms of political discourse and to destroy movements for reform, isolating honest reformers, or even transforming such movements into tools of the Establishment.
Moreover, if the fear of an evil conspiracy of "Elders of Zion" can be sufficiently whipped up, ordinary people can be gotten to surrender rights and to engage in criminal acts which they would never permit, let alone support, under normal circumstances.
"The Protocols" is a work of fiction. But it was not originally written mainly to attack Jews or Masons. Rather, it employed the rhetorical device of a supposed Jewish/Mason conspiracy to attack democrats trying to reform the Russian Empire, accusing them of being agents of the imaginary Jewish conspiracy.
The Russian Czar's secret police, the Okhrana, fabricated "The Protocols" in the 1890s. Pyotr Ivanovich Rachkovsky, then head of the Russian Secret Police abroad, probably ordered the writing of the Protocols. Rachkovsky was a big advocate of using anti-Semitism to attack reformers and revolutionaries. After the Russian Revolution of 1905, he helped organize the fascist-like Black Hundreds in Russia
The goal of "The Protocols" was to convince Russians that the liberal reformers and social revolutionaries threatening the power of the Russian aristocracy would destroy Russia.
Advocates of "the Protocols" claim it is the minutes of a meeting of some "Elders of Zion." Pretending for the moment that these Elders existed, they would hate the Aristocrats (since they are trying to undermine them). So why on earth would they make flowery, overblown statements about the mystical glories of the Russian aristocracy? Why would they say that the Russian autocracy was chosen by God?
They wouldn't. But advocates of the Russian aristocracy would. Especially if they were writing a pamphlet which used a fictional meeting of "Elders of Zion" as a device to boost the Aristocracy and paint its opponents as "agents of the Jews".
Once you understand that "The Protocols" was a hoax intended to prevent social reforms in quasi-feudal Russia, it makes sense. But if you try to read "The Protocols" as the minutes of a supposed meeting of real conspirators, it's an incoherent mess