OTHER NOTES:

today was all about "we not all like that" MI5 ONLINE replies...you mean 'haters' who - once they have decided to 'hate' a particular group...do so 'unto the death'...something like that? I will provide the context, later on - for my reply....

....and what was 'that one' all about? something around 'PANTENE' firstly...and 360ml...in relation to 360 degrees....and  also involving GCHQ - in solving that particular conundrum...but a 'temporary solution'...something around SPIN F?

what else? I can remember watching footage of 'gill on the coastline'....he had been 'got' and was unable to 'turn around'...."total robot time" replies MI5 ONLINE.....'got' by somebody, who was holding what appeared to be a 'mobile phone' but was in fact more like 'what scarlett had had in his hands, in Harwich - whilst controlling petrol nell'  - see previous notes....

anyway, the 'mobile phone' was then hacked by his MI5 team and gill was then 'turned around' 360 degrees - so that he could see who was behind him - and was able to move again 'in any direction'...in order to 'get out of danger'...

PANTENE....pan-10....pan the god of chaos....and the taschmanns....100 degree turn 'ability' or 360 degree turn 'ability'....the difference between 't' and 'i' on the ground?

OTHER NOTES:

today I was to go to sainsburys....to have a look at the PANTENE bottles upon 'special offer'....I didn't read the small print and therefore had no idea that only the 100ml bottles were on 'special offer'...an understandable mistake because the sales rack only contained 360ml bottles and so naturally I figured that the sales tag label beneath the large PANTENE bottles - referred to 360 and not 100....

put simply - I was then to decide to buy two '360 ml pantene conditioner bottles' on 'good faith' that both were on 'special offer'....to then proceed to 'put them through a self-service till'...knowing as I did so - that 'something wasn't right' and therefore I was prepared for what was to happen next....

in short, an assistant was then to read 'the whole sales tag label' on the rack - in order to work it out....to then reply that somebody had been messing around with the bottles....what he didn't tell me was that somebody had put a whole load of 360ml bottles upon the sales rack with a 100ml special offer 'sales tag label' beneath them....a bit of a con, eh?

anyway, another assistant at the self-service tills - then took the PANTENE sales item off of my bill (another oddity - as she was to register immediately - only one of the two bottles that I had 'put through the till' - had registered, even though both had been 'beeped' through the till - I listen for the 'beep' you see - I don't bother to read what is on the screen)....

and why had I wanted PANTENE taken off my bill.....well, you see - an individual bottle was far too expensive at £2.95....and the 'special offer' had been a reduction of nearly £1.50....'on the sales tag label'....

does, the above even make sense...I wonder, now...in relation to the difference in size of the bottles....the 100ml is tiny, in relation to the large 360ml bottle....you would have thought that the 100ml bottle, wouldn't even cost £1.50....

 '....seeing as the 360ml bottles cost £2.95....what the hell had the 100ml bottles cost in the first place?' was my first thought, at the self-service till....

...but upon second thoughts...maybe it wasn't about that....it was about a reduction in price 'per ml' but only for the 100ml bottles....but how could that be, considering the 'content' should be the same in 100ml bottles and 360ml bottles....

and now we are really in 'wonderland' aren't we? a bit like NPOWER and their fuel bills....I cannot be bothered to 'work it out' because that would involve going back to the shop again...and reading those 'special offer tag labels'....in order to work it out...and is it really worth it...knowing as I do now...that it was all a memory aid...relating to remembering a certain Sainsbury's assistant upon that MI5 team - who had rescued gill from only 100 degrees 'ability'...who hadn't wanted to be mentioned....and had told me so 'quite a few years ago now'....

...and why wouldn't he want to be named....because he wasn't a 'hater'....and he knew that 'indian intelligence' was playing that game, at that point in time - so many years ago now....playing the 'race card'....in relation to something that went along the lines of:

"scarlett did that to petrol nell' - a white man did that to an indian-looking woman....well we are going to do the same today, outside of Sainsbury's....an indian-looking man controlling a blonde woman - with his 'mobile phone"....

and so the above, in a nutshell - was what I was to see, outside of Sainsbury's, by the cashpoint, today.....

'haters will be haters' and emotional blackmail is the worst (do you not think that it is emotionally upsetting and hurtful to be called a 'racist - a slavedriver' just because your skin colour is white?)....

let me see....the pentagon had sussed out indian intelligence 'so many years ago now'...to find out that they had been behind the technology 'to do that sort of 'horror' - which they had then sold on to scarlett....cue scarlett with 'cutting edge' indian intelligence technology in his hand, controlling petrol nell....

"the pot calling the kettle black" replies MI5 ONLINE....is that the right metaphor? remember indian intelligence were playing the 'race card' today....in relation to that 'indian-looking man' but he could have been from 'anywhere'....using his 'mobile phone' to make that woman-in-front-of-him move around and then 'stop'....indian intelligence's tannoy system was to tell me NOT to take a photo...well, I am always of a 'diplomatic nature' in those sort of circumstances, aren't I? in short, the whole thing, amused me....deadly games and gallows humour....and I had realised that 'indian intelligence' meant no harm...they were simply 'exposing even more' in their own way....about the ill cult and 'just how far things have gone'.

what they hadn't realised...was that the pentagon had recognised their 'signature' - so long ago now...having been through the 'layers of the internet' in relation to the Birmingham MAC...as well as other locations....

all I can say to 'the above' is that I will not be involved in any further discussions of 'any of it'....suffice to say that NOBODY should have been 'competing' to bring that sort of technology out - 'black or white', in the first place - should they? you are ALL nasty children - as far as I am concerned....verging on 'chuckie dolls'....with your remote-controls and your remote-controlled microchipped human beings....

"...but once the technology is out there, we have to deal with it" MI5 replies. Yes I can see that...which leads to untold 'horrors' doesn't it?